Best guess

"In Re: Harold A. O'Connell"?

Can we find out what the issue is in "In Re: Harold A. O'Connell"?  This reference appears in the Summons, the Notice to appear in Court, and the Order to appear in Court, that I was sent after trying to expose the accounting trails of the Attorney Edward White and the CPA Joanne Barnes at bk467p191 (pdf) in the public record.

My best guess is that it is related to the following instructions given to our Mother Jean O'Connell about the same time she was given the false lost account and the false final account in January of 1985. I found her memos of these instructions in her papers after her death in 1991:

"Bond fee- Lawyer fix so
bond pd when sold.
nominal amt now."

"Clerk 691-2224
691-4193- give
fiduciary no. 21840
(Procedure
Come in - surety bond-)
(Va resident with)
Patty Moat ot"

Whatever the accountants had our Mother do remains unknown. My best guess is that the accountants instructed her to come in to the Court and sign a document under the guise that it was a customary and usual document concerning non-resident fiduciaries (I was the nominated Trustee and lived in Missouri and needed a Virginia resident co-trustee to qualify with me) and that it would save money on the cost of a bond. But what this document actually did, was to justify the accountants shutting me out and making it appear that they were protecting the family. This is my best guess. Concealment is an impossible obstacle to overcome.

What do the Court records show resulted from these instructions to Jean O'Connell? What do the Court records show as the issue in "In Re: Harold A. O'Connell"? Are they the same or related thing? I don't have the power to find out. Is there a just power who would?

 
 
     
 
 

These are Jean O'Connell's memos of the accountant's covert instructions to her. History suggests that she and her family were doomed from this point. Concealment is an impossible obstacle to overcome.